OUR PROFESSIONALS
Connect with the right R&G Brenner expert — search by state, specialty, or return type.
 
Find A Tax Pro
BOOK AN APPOINTMENT
Meet with your tax pro — remotely or in office.
 
 
Book Now!
Tax App Download - Apple
tax-app-download-google-play
Need to File an Amended Return?

CURRENT PROMOTIONS 

Get Up to $6,000 Refund Advance

Receive 50 Dollars in Cash - Tax Preparation Referral Program

RGB-Partnerships

Empower your business growth with tailored partnership solutions from R&G Brenner. Reduce costs, increase marketing, and improve client retention with our proven track record and comprehensive support. Partner with us today!

RGB-job-opportunities

Join our team of experienced tax professionals at R&G Brenner! We're hiring CPAs, EAs, office managers, assistants, and building maintenance staff. Apply now for exciting opportunities in tax and accounting services.

5th Amendment Protection? Not From The IRS

No quod sanctus instructior ius, et intellegam interesset duo. Vix cu nibh gubergren dissentias. His velit veniam habemus ne. No doctus neglegentur vituperatoribus est, qui ad ipsum oratio. Ei duo dicant facilisi, qui at harum democritum consetetur.

 

Taking the 5th? Not So Fast...
Taking the 5th? Not So Fast...

By Robert W. Wood

…Imagine getting a grand jury subpoena to produce your own offshore bank records. Can’t you take the Fifth? The Fifth Amendment says you cannot be forced to incriminate yourself. It turns out there’s an exception for “required records.”

In In re Grand Jury Investigation M.H., the Ninth Circuit allowed prosecutors to compel someone to produce offshore account data even if it was self-incriminating. The Seventh Circuit has just done the same in IN RE: SPECIAL FEBRUARY 2011–1 GRAND JURY SUBPOENAUnder the Required Records Doctrine, it doesn’t violate your rights if:

~The government’s inquiry is essentially regulatory;

~The information is a preserved record of a kind customarily retained; and

~The records have taken on public aspects making them analogous to a public document.

You might be shocked to learn that foreign bank records could be viewed in this way. But two appellate courts have said so. In the Ninth Circuit, it was “M.H.” who lost. In the Seventh, it was “T.W.” These names may not remain secret much longer.

Suppose the IRS and Department of Justice are investigating, trying to determine if you used offshore bank accounts to evade taxes. The grand jury issues a subpoena demanding records you are required to keep under the Bank Secrecy Act of ’70—that’s the law requiring FBARs. You try to quash the subpoena based on your Constitutional privilege against self-incrimination, since handing over the records clearly would incriminate you.

But the courts are saying the Required Records Doctrine trumps your Fifth Amendment privilege. Sure, the government has to establish the three elements of the Required Records Doctrine. But once they do, youhave to hand over the documents no matter how incriminating they are. The Fifth Amendment doesn’t allow you to refuse to produce them.

This kind of development should make the IRS voluntary disclosure program even more attractive…

Robert W. Wood practices law with Wood LLP, in San Francisco. The author of more than 30 books, including Taxation of Damage Awards & Settlement Payments (4th Ed. 2009 with 2012 Supplement, Tax Institute), he can be reached atWood@WoodLLP.com. This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.

Source: Forbes